Radioactive dating of fossils depends on the decay of
Even if such a "proof" were technically correct, it would likely shoot down only a weak model of the theory.
It's the type of blunder one might find in a high school science project.
Nor does he discuss the weaknesses in his arguments.
(By comparison, Darwin was always mindful to point out potential problems and acknowledge the strongest opposing arguments.) In short, Dr. The worst, by far, is the assumption that if the sun is shrinking today, then it has always been shrinking!
This magic bullet mentality, the tendency to rely on a single, isolated argument to win all the chips, has gotten creationists into more trouble than possibly anything else.
Unfortunately, Mother Nature does not give little, gold ribbons to certify the accuracy of our proofs!